Evidence of the people responsible for “Qanon” being responsible for “Qanon”
The article below outlines the case for what Qanon is, where is came from, and who was behind it:
Given its length and breadth, there were many elements on which it could only touch briefly. It focused on the narrative, rather than the evidence. This article will focus on the evidence, rather than the narrative. Its purpose is to provide the supplementary documentation to support the claims in the article above. It offers material found in the course of investigation. Make of it what you will, that’s the whole of the law.
Schoenberger, etc:
Arturo’s Journey:
Connecting Robert David Steel, Manuel Chavez, Trevor Fitzgibbon, Kim Dot Com, Sean Stone, “Flynn”, etc:
Media Platforms:
Influence Strategies:
New Age Circles / Lisa Clapier / Snow White:
Example of a “victim” of this operation:
Thomas’s Fascist Tendencies:
And his history of psychologically violent abuse:
Admitting Connection to SnowWhite Twitter acc (name = TS):
How Thomas reacts to the Narrative and being challenged on twitter:
(Thomas is TeslasPigeon / @PraiseHermes1,
author is You’re Amazing / @River_Advntures)
Incredible mention of “entraining brainwave” technology, implanting subliminal messages in video, from a company in which Betsy Devos is an investor, and an interesting mention of another project:
Policy Agenda Items:
Intelligence Connections:
#Unity4J / Wikileaks / Julian Assange:
Russian Amplification:
Miscellaneous material:
There has been some debate about the true nature of Q lately. Many have been helpful in mapping out its movements. But when it comes to finding out who’s responsible, they have been curiously, often aggressively, disinterested. People calling it an operation have been met with mockery and ridicule.
There is a lot to unpack about what’s going on here, and perhaps we can do that another time. For now let’s assume that it basically boils down to “there’s no evidence”. Hopefully this changes that. If all the above is still considered to be inconclusive, surely we can at least agree that it raises reasonable suspicions, which warrant further investigation. Of course many of the lines are blurred. It’s hard to know where lies end and influence begins. Where the organic becomes the orchestrated. It’s a lot like a bushfire — the movements often look natural. But arson is deadly. That’s what we’re dealing with. Everything above is what an amateur on the other side of the world was able to uncover over a few months in his spare time. Is it somewhat of a mess? Sure. There isn’t a neat explanation for this. This is not a simple story with an easy answer. There is still a lot to uncover, and we need to get on with fleshing out the rest of it, to dig in to all of the characters and their connections, so that these people can be brought to justice for the harm they have caused.
If you’d like to help fix this enourmous problem, please get invovled with The Thinkin Project.
Further reading:
Analysis of the “Save the Children” campaign:
History of the weaponisation of conspiracies:
Other important links:
VIDEOS:
How Roger Stone weaponised Alex Jones’ audience to elect Trump:
Weaponisation of Social Media:
Weaponisation of disinformation:
And a lot more videos that explore all the rest of the evidence:
The Essential work of Arturo: